《徕卡与蔡司参数对比.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《徕卡与蔡司参数对比.docx(7页珍藏版)》请在三一文库上搜索。
1、显微镜参数对比M300 (Leica)Pico(Zeiss)光学系统品牌顶级品牌,徕卡品牌160多年历 史,为光学领域的奢侈品最高端品 牌,在欧洲有徕卡皇族之称,其 1913年的首部原型照相机被市场 拍卖到280万欧元的天价,可见徕 卡在光学成像领域的品牌地位。主 要原因之一是其光学品质无与伦 比。咼端品牌,有徕卡皇族、祭司贵 族之称立体基线(决定光学景 深、立体感)Stereo base22mm22mm物镜直径大于等于68mm小于50mm视野10.5-114.811-73mm双目筒可调加长专用,可坐直操作; 六种选择可调/45度两种支架臂展长1550mm1450mm上下拉伸1060 mm约6
2、00mm光源150W卤素灯100W卤素灯M320 (Leica)Movena(Zeiss)品牌顶级品牌,徕卡品牌160多年历 史,为光学领域的奢侈品最高端品 牌,在欧洲有徕卡皇族之称,其 1913年的首部原型照相机被市场高端品牌,有徕卡皇族、蔡司 贵族之称拍卖到280万欧兀的天价,可见徕 卡在光学成像领域的品牌地位。主 要原因之一是其光学品质无与伦 比。光学系统立体基线(决定光学 景深、立体感)Stereo base24mm22mm物镜直径大于等于68mm小于50mm视野大于等于5.3-206mm12-116mm放大倍数1.5-40X1.9-18.2x支架臂展长1775mm1315mm上下拉伸
3、1621 mm720mm表面处理支架具有纳米银离子涂层,防止交叉感染无光源LED光源照明系统,无光纤传导,无线裸露100W卤素灯,光纤传导有线裸 漏双LED照明模块,每个平均使用寿命为60000小时有使用寿命,需要更换内置橙色滤镜,防止填充物由于光照导致固化速度加快无可以提供无紫外线UV和无红外线IR的LED照明无注: 经实际测量,立柱式方案中,由四张桌子的中心点到医生的操作距离(包括整 个头模拉出,医生坐在操作椅上操作),应该不小于1500mm,徕卡显微镜无论是M300或是M320的工作距离,足够完成医生的需求,并且可以做到最舒适!LEICA M525 DENT vs ZEISS PROer
4、go牙科手术显微镜技术对比品牌LEICA M525 F20 DENT卡品牌16 0多年历史,顶级品牌,徕为光学领域的奢侈品最咼端品牌,在ZEISS PROergo S7高端品牌,有徕卡皇族、蔡司贵族之称欧洲有徕卡皇族之称,其1913年的首 部原型照相机被市场拍卖到280万欧元的天价,可见徕卡在光学成像领域 的品牌地位。主要原因之一是其光学品质无与伦比。*光学在原厂品质排序徕卡顶级光学蔡司中端光学顶级是N euro光学次级是Vario光学第三档为 proergo/Se nsera*光学品质采用专利的0 ptiChrome技术, 采用了新型镜片材料、镀膜技 术和设计参数,2008年上市, 立体基线
5、24mm陈旧的中低端光学,2004年上市,立体基线22mm*且:空好。此指标世界同类产品中最 优秀最大约180mm,两个手掌大,保证牙科根 管治疗的顺利进行,能够顺利 看到根尖1/3部分一般*放大倍数1.5x-16x2.3x-14x*聚焦电动或手动多焦点透镜组聚焦,工作距离207-470m m,满足深部、浅部所有手术电动或手动可变焦距聚焦,工作距 离200-415m m,通过在原有物镜 前添加一个附加物镜,工作距离可 以达到210-535m m,但影响了原 有的光路,光学质量严重下降*工作距离变化范 围263 mm215 mm*视野16.5mm-180m m,世界最优视野是衡量显微镜光学品质的
6、重要参数16mm-75mm*自动光栏AutoIris专利技术,照明光斑随放大倍 数变化自动匹配为整个视野大 小,术者视野外无多余的照明 ,最大限度地保护视野外口腔 组织不受灼伤无此技术*光强亮度保护BrightCare照明强度随工作距离的变化自动匹配,保证视野内的口腔组织不受灼伤无此技术*光源内置180W氙灯(标配)100瓦卤素灯或者18 0瓦氙灯(选配)*控制系统新型彩色触摸屏控制器(焦距、倍数、光亮度可触摸控制),预存10组个性化设置按键式控制器,开机只可分别选择3个参数,预存3套个性设置底座X型底座保证其稳固及灵活移动608x608 mm,不占用多余空间十字滚轮底座,640x640m m
7、占地面积较大注:国际某知名品牌的40例灼伤报告:http:/www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfMAUDE/textsearch.cfm以上是FDA的网站,请写入pentero,按下search键(pentero是蔡司价值最高端显微镜)Company Model Type rep.Date MDR Key ev.type notesCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 07.10.09 1552721 Injury patient burnCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 22.
8、09.09 1487302 Injury 2nd degree patient burnCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 28.08.09 1463653 Injury 3rd degree patient burnCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 21.05.09 1417983 Injury patient burnCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 02.03.09 1341655 Injury patient burnCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 19.12
9、08 1272491 Injury materialCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 06.10.08 1190047 Injury burnCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 05.09.08 1149604 Injury light caused 3rd degree burnsCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 05.09.08 1149683 Injury Patient Outcome DisabilityCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 02.06.08 1
10、054098 Injury burn level 2CARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 24.04.08 1034581 Injury patient burn on the right earCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 26.03.08 1019975 Injury Required InterventionCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 28.09.07 920473Injury 2nd degree burn during nerve repairCARL ZEISS SURGICAL
11、OPMI PENTERO 27.09.07 920471Injury chemical burnCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 09.08.07 891533Injury 3rd degreeCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 22.06.07 869876Injury 3rd degree burnCARL ZEISS SURGICAL OPMI PENTERO 04.06.07 859125Injury burn灼伤案例:http:/www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfma
12、ude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi_id=1149604MAUDEINC.RL ZEISS MEDITEC,epERATINGBack to Search ResultsMICROSCOPENONECARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC. OPMI PENTEROOPERATING MICROSCOPE NONEEvent Date 03/02/2007Event Type Injury Patient Outcome DisabilityEvent Descripti onThe microscope light caused 3rd degree burns and per
13、manent nerve damage to the interior and exterior of the ear. Thirty percent of right ear tissue is gone and pt has no feeling in the interior or exterior of the right ear.The intensity of the light was set at 30%. However, it was noted by the attending md that it increased to near 100% as the surger
14、y progressed.Seal ch Aleits/Recalls20New Search | Submit an Adverse Event Report21Brand Name Type of DeviceMan ufacturer (Section F)Man ufacturer (Section D)Device Event Key MDR Report Key Event Key Report NumberDevice Seque nce NumberProduct Code Report Source Reporter Occupati on Type of Report Re
15、port Date 1 Device Was Involved in the Event 1 Patie nt Was Involved in the Event Date FDA Received Is This An Adverse Event Report? Is This A Product Problem Report?Device OperatorIs The Reporter A Health Professio nal? Was The Report Sent To Man ufacturer?Is this a Reprocessed and Reused Si ngle-Use Device?Is the Device an Implant?OPMI PENTERO OPERATING MICROSCOPENONECARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC.dublin CACARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC.dublin CAMW5008195HRM22VoluntaryRISK MANAGERInitial09/05/200809/05/2008YesYesHealth ProfessionalYesNoNoNo1167524114960411020951Is this an Expla nted Device?